Design and Analysis of a Frequency Reconfigurable Penta-Band Antenna for WLAN and 5G Applications

Article information

J Electromagn Eng Sci. 2021;21(3):228-235
Publication date (electronic) : 2021 July 31
doi : https://doi.org/10.26866/jees.2021.3.r.30
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Sreenidhi Institute of Science and Technology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
*Corresponding Author: Rekha Shanmugam (e-mail: mrs.s.rekha@gmail.com)
Received 2020 August 30; Revised 2020 December 23; Accepted 2021 March 2.

Abstract

This paper presents a discussion on a low-profile, frequency-reconfigurable penta-band antenna. This antenna consists of two asymmetric L-shaped rectangular patches electrically connected by a single PIN diode. The proposed antenna operates at five frequency bands depending upon the switching states of the PIN diode. It operates at 2.4 GHz (WLAN) and 5.3 GHz (5G) during forward bias of the diode, 3.3 GHz (5G) and 5.9 GHz (WLAN) during reverse bias of the diode and 4 GHz during zero bias condition providing a wide bandwidth (3.6–4.8 GHz) at this state. The antenna has voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR) ranges from 1 to 2, gain value ranges from 2.6 to 5.0 dBi, and a maximum radiation efficiency of 85%. This antenna can be integrated with modern devices such as smart phones, laptops, and other handheld devices due to its simplistic geometry. A prototype of the model is fabricated, and the results are validated.

I. Introduction

Due to speedy developments in modern communication, there is a pressing need for reconfigurable antennas. Decades ago, individual antennas were employed to obtain different operating frequencies, increasing the dimensions of the system. Conversely, UWB antennas can be utilized to attain a wide frequency range (3.1–10.6 GHz) [1]. However, there are some disadvantages in using UWB antennas, such as interference and co-existence with other radios. Thus, the concept of reconfigurability has evolved to avoid these scenarios. Frequency reconfigurability [2] has significantly reduced the antenna size, so that they can easily be employed in any compact handheld device. There are two other categories of reconfigurable antennas: polarization [3] and pattern [4]. It is possible to realize two or more reconfigurabilities at the same time depending on the number of switches. The cognitive radio system represents the near future of wireless communication, in which an antenna tunes to the desired frequency based on the available spectrum [5]. Accordingly, reconfigurable antennas are one of the best solutions for such adaptive systems and are used in satellite communications and radar systems.

Generally, reconfigurability is attained by using various switching devices, such as PIN diodes [6], varactor diodes [7], microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) switches [8], lumped elements [9], or optical switches [10]. These devices alter the structure (length) of the radiating element depending on the ON and OFF conditions. In the literature, many reconfigurable antennas have been designed that incorporate frequency, polarization, pattern, and hybrid reconfigurability (depending on the application). In [11], a PIN diode was included in the center of the slot, and frequency diversity was obtained by changing the bias voltage and keeping the other parameters (such as geometry and feeding probe) constant. The bandwidth can also be changed by varying the PIN diode. In [12], a ground plane was embedded with a DGS structure having two symmetrical U-shaped slots (with open ends) and an I-shaped slot (with a short end). The ground plane incorporated three PIN diodes to achieve multiband resonances.

In [13], a frequency reconfigurable antenna with coplanar waveguide (CPW) feeding was designed to cover a wide frequency range (2–10 GHz). The antenna used four PIN diodes to achieve different resonant frequencies in the wide frequency band. Further, the type of feeding, structure of the radiator, and number of diodes employed were the deciding factors for the operating frequency ranges. Discussions about a reconfigurable antenna having proximity couple feeding for WLAN and sub-6 GHz applications were presented in [14]. The antenna consisted of two substrates (separated by air) with four PIN diodes. However, the dimensions of the antenna are large and the structure is complex with this type of feeding. Finally, by using a reconfigurable feed network, frequency and polarization diversity can be achieved [15]. From the literature, it can be understood that PIN diodes are more user friendly in terms of less switching complexity, higher speed and reliability.

A compact, low-profile, frequency-reconfigurable microstrip patch antenna built on a FR4 substrate is discussed in this paper. Compared to conventional reconfigurable antenna models, this antenna only contains one PIN diode and generates five resonant frequencies. During forward bias, the operating bands are 2.4 and 5.3 GHz, whereas they are 3.3 and 5.9 GHz in reverse bias. These operating frequencies cover the WLAN (2.4 and 5.9 GHz) and 5G (5.3 and 3.7 GHz) bands. During zero bias, the antenna operates between 3.6 and 4.8 GHz.

Section II presents a discussion about the antenna design, including the geometry, design equations, switching techniques, and current distribution. Section III focuses on the simulation and fabrication results, while Section IV provides a brief conclusion of the proposed work.

II. Antenna Design

1. Geometry of the Proposed Antenna

The model consists of two asymmetric L-shaped rectangular patches, with one of the patches fed through a 50 Ω microstrip line. The antenna was printed on a lossy FR4 substrate material —relative permittivity (ɛr) of 4.4 and tangent loss (δ) of 0.02— with a thickness of 1.6 mm. The use of FR4 was preferred in the proposed model because of its affordability and availability. The radiating element was backed by a metallic truncated ground plane to provide optimum efficiency, gain, and directivity. A rectangular stub was placed on the ground to improve impedance matching at higher resonant frequencies. An electrical path was provided between the two rectangular patches through a PIN diode. A full wave electromagnetic (EM) simulator—Ansys High Frequency Structure Simulator (HFSS)—was used to carry simulation of the proposed design. The total length of the radiator was 33.5 mm, and the width was 4 mm, and the overall dimensions was 40 mm ×35 mm ×1.6 mm. The geometry of the antenna is shown in Fig. 1. Table 1 presents the dimensions of the proposed model.

Fig. 1

Geometry of proposed model.

Dimensions of proposed design

2. Design Equations

The effective length and dielectric permittivity of a rectangular radiating element are given by Eqs. (1) and (2) from [16].

(1) Leff=c4freff
(2) effr+12

Here, c is the velocity of light in free space, fr is the resonant frequency, ∈eff is the effective dielectric permittivity, ∈r is the permittivity of the dielectric substrate, w is the width of the substrate, and h is the height of the substrate.

If the antenna is excited at an appropriate impedance point, the reflection coefficient should be < −10 dB and voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR) would range between 1 and 2. The reflection coefficient is related to the impedance matching of the system and is given by Eq. (3).

(3) Reflection coefficient Γ=Za-ZfZa+Zf

Here, Za is the impedance of the antenna, Zf is the feedline’s characteristic impedance, and Γ is the reflection coefficient. The VSWR is related to the reflection coefficient through Eq. (4).

(4) VSWR=1+Γ1-Γ

3. Switching Techniques

A PIN diode (NXP BAP64-03, 100 mA, 20 V) was employed for frequency reconfiguration in the proposed model. The equivalent circuits of the PIN diode in its ON and OFF states are shown in Fig. 2(a) and (b), respectively.

Fig. 2

Equivalent circuit of PIN diode in (a) ON, (b) OFF state, and (c) lumped RLC boundary in HFSS.

The three biasing states of a PIN diode are as follows: (i) zero DC, (ii) positive DC, and (iii) negative DC. In the simulation, the PIN diode was modelled as a lumped RLC equivalent. For zero DC bias, there was no connection between the two L-shaped rectangular patches (such that there was no electrical path between them). The lower L-shaped rectangular patch was the only active radiator. During positive DC bias, the diode represented a series combination of 2.5 Ω resistance and 1.68 nH inductance (in the simulation). The lower value of R in the forward bias increased the current flow between the radiating strips. During reverse DC bias, the diode provided a parallel combination of 0.3 pF capacitance and 15 kΩ resistance in series with an inductance of 1.68 nH (in the simulation). The higher value of R during reverse bias restricted the current flow.

The inductor value was kept constant, as it did not have any significant effect on the current distribution. The values of R, L, and C were considered from the data sheet of the PIN diode model. These values were tuned in the given range, ensuring resonance was achieved in the desired frequency band. The assignment of a lumped RLC boundary in the simulation tool, Ansys HFSS, is shown in Fig 2(c). Bias voltages of 0, +3, and −3 V were applied to the circuit for the zero, forward, and reverse biases, respectively. Depending on the type of biasing, different resonant frequencies were obtained from the single antenna model, as indicated in Table 2.

Different configurations of PIN diodes with their simulated operating frequencies

4. Current Distribution

The proposed frequency reconfigurable antenna was simulated using Ansys HFSS. The far field radiation was mainly due to the current on the radiator. The simulated surface current densities at all five frequency bands are presented in Fig. 3. During forward bias, the antenna resonated at two frequencies. At the lower resonance, the surface current density was large on the lower L-shaped patch, as indicated in Fig. 3(a). The length of the lower L-shaped patch was 20 mm (i.e., c = 17 + e mm), in which most of the current was distributed in the lower part (i.e., c = 17 mm). The approximate length of the quarter wave at 2.4 GHz was calculated as 17 mm using the design Eqs. (1) and (2). This is illustrated using the vector surface current distribution at 2.4 GHz (phase 0°) in Fig. 4.

Fig. 3

Simulated surface current density of the proposed design at (a) 2.4 GHz, (b) 5.3 GHz, (c) 3.3 GHz, (d) 5.9 GHz, and (e) 4 GHz.

Fig. 4

Vector surface current distribution at 2.4 GHz (phase 0°).

As indicated in Fig. 3(b), the surface current was distributed on the upper and lower L-shaped strips. It can also be observed that the surface current was distributed strongly around the stub. The length of the stub was slightly less than the quarter wavelength at 5.3 GHz. This rectangular stub on the ground plane played a vital role in achieving impedance matching at higher frequencies.

To illustrate the influence of the stub for impedance matching, the simulated reflection coefficient is plotted in Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Effects of stub at higher frequencies: (a) forward bias and (b) reverse bias.

With the rectangular stub, the antenna realized improved matching at the higher frequencies: 5.3 GHz in forward bias and 5.9 GHz in reverse bias.

III. Results and Discussion

To validate the results, the model was fabricated and then measured using an Agilent vector network analyzer. A photograph of the fabricated antenna is presented in Fig. 6, while Fig. 7 displays a comparison between the simulated and measured return losses. The simulated antenna (at zero bias) achieved a −10 dB impedance bandwidth of 1.2 GHz (3.6–4.8 GHz) with a center frequency at 4 GHz. During forward bias of the diode (+3 V), the antenna resonated at two frequencies: 2.4 GHz (2.1–2.5 GHz) and 5.3 GHz (5–5.6 GHz). During reverse bias of the diode (−3 V), the antenna resonated at 3.3 GHz (2.8–3.6 GHz) and 5.9 GHz (5.5–6.1 GHz).

Fig. 6

A photograph of the fabricated antenna: (a) front view and (b) rear view.

Fig. 7

Return loss at (a) zero bias, (b) forward bias, and (c) reverse bias.

The measured resonant frequency at zero bias was 4.1 GHz with a bandwidth of 3.7–4.9 GHz. During forward bias, the antenna resonated at 2.47 GHz (2.2–2.6 GHz) and 5.4 GHz (5.1–5.7 GHz). During reverse bias, the antenna resonated at 3.38 GHz (2.8–3.7 GHz) and 6 GHz (5.5–6.3 GHz). The small deviation between the measured and simulated results could be due to minor fabrication errors and soldering losses in the SMA connector.

The measured gain at all resonant frequencies is displayed in Fig. 8. The gain varied between 2.6 and 5 dBi for the operating frequencies, which is acceptable for the previously mentioned applications. The efficiencies of the proposed antenna at all biasing conditions are displayed in Fig. 9. Further, the maximum and minimum radiation efficiencies were 85% and 76%, respectively. The simulated and measured E- and H-plane gain patterns at all five operating frequencies are presented in Fig. 10. It can be observed that the antenna radiated omni-directionally in the H-plane at 2.4, 6, and 4.1 GHz. All the E-plane patterns adopted a figure-of-8 shape, with a null lobe occurring at 90°. The simulated and measured patterns were in good agreement, with a minor difference of 0.5 dB.

Fig. 8

Measured gain of proposed antenna.

Fig. 9

Efficiency of proposed antenna.

Fig. 10

Simulated and measured gains of E- and H-planes at (a) 2.4 GHz, (b) 5.4 GHz, (c) 3.3 GHz, (d) 6 GHz, and (e) 4.1 GHz

Table 3 presents a detailed summary of the simulated and measured results. Table 4 presents a detailed comparison between the proposed antenna and other (similar) models in the literature.

Summary of simulated and measured results of the proposed antenna

Performance comparison between proposed antenna and those in the literature

IV. Conclusion

A simple and compact penta-band frequency-reconfigurable antenna is proposed in this paper. The presented patch antenna uses a single PIN diode connected between two rectangular strips. The various switching states of the PIN diode are responsible for achieving the desired operating frequency. It can operate at five frequency bands (2.4, 3.3, 5.3, 5.9, and 4 GHz), rendering it suitable for applications in WLAN and 5G. The antenna has acceptable ranges of gain from 2.6 to 5 dBi, and the maximum efficiency is 85%. This prototype was fabricated on easily available low-cost FR4 substrate, and the results were validated through measurements. The simulated results were in good agreement with the measured results.

References

1. Rekha S, Nesasudha M. Design of circularly polarized planar monopole antenna with improved axial ratio bandwidth. Microwave and Optical Technology Letters 59(9):2353–2358. 2017;
2. Ali T, Biradar RC. A compact hexagonal slot dual band frequency reconfigurable antenna for WLAN applications. Microwave and Optical Technology Letters 59(4):958–964. 2017;
3. Wong H, Lin W, Huitema L, Arnaud E. Multipolarization reconfigurable antenna for wireless biomedical system. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems 11(3):652–660. 2017;
4. Lin W, Wong H, Ziolkowski RW. Wideband pattern-reconfigurable antenna with switchable broadside and conical beams. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 16:2638–2641. 2017;
5. Kantemur A, Tak J, Siyari P, Abdelrahman AH, Krunz M, Xin H. A novel compact reconfigurable broadband antenna for cognitive radio applications. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 68(9):6538–6547. 2020;
6. Saraswat RK, Kumar M. A frequency band reconfigurable UWB antenna for high gain applications. Progress in Electromagnetics Research B 64:29–45. 2015;
7. Kehn MNM, Quevedo-Teruel O, Rajo-Iglesias E. Reconfigurable loaded planar inverted-F antenna using varactor diodes. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 10:466–468. 2011;
8. Ruvio G, Ammann MJ, Chen ZN. Wideband reconfigurable rolled planar monopole antenna. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 55(6):1760–1767. 2007;
9. Shah SAA, Khan MF, Ullah S, Flint JA. Design of a multi-band frequency reconfigurable planar monopole antenna using truncated ground plane for Wi-Fi, WLAN and WiMAX applications. In : Proceedings of 2014 International Conference on Open Source Systems & Technologies. Lahore, Pakistan; 2014; p. 151–155.
10. Panagamuwa CJ, Chauraya A, Vardaxoglou JC. Frequency and beam reconfigurable antenna using photo-conducting switches. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 54(2):449–454. 2006;
11. Boufrioua A. Frequency reconfigurable antenna designs using PIN diode for wireless communication applications. Wireless Personal Communications 110(4):1879–1885. 2020;
12. Sathikbasha MJ, Nagarajan V. Design of multiband frequency reconfigurable antenna with defected ground structure for wireless applications. Wireless Personal Communications 113(2):867–892. 2020;
13. Khan T, Rahman M, Akram A, Amin Y, Tenhunen H. A low-cost CPW-fed multiband frequency reconfigurable antenna for wireless applications. Electronics 8(8)article no 900. 2019; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics8080900 .
14. Shah IA, Hayat S, Khan I, Alam I, Ullah S, Afridi A. A compact, tri-band and 9-shape reconfigurable antenna for WiFi, WiMAX and WLAN applications. International Journal of Wireless and Microwave Technologies 6(5):45–53. 2016;
15. Selvam YP, Elumalai L, Alsath MGN, Kanagasabai M, Subbaraj S, Kingsly S. Novel frequency-and pattern-reconfigurable rhombic patch antenna with switchable polarization. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 16:1639–1642. 2017;
16. Stutzman WL, Thiele GA. Antenna Theory and Design Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2013.
17. Ullah S, Hayat S, Umar A, Ali U, Tahir FA, Flint JA. Design, fabrication and measurement of triple band frequency reconfigurable antennas for portable wireless communications. AEU-International Journal of Electronics and Communications 81:236–242. 2017;
18. Selvam YP, Kanagasabai M, Alsath MGN, Velan S, Kingsly S, Subbaraj S, Rao YVR, Srinivasan R, Varadhan AK, Karuppiah M. A low-profile frequency-and pattern-reconfigurable antenna. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 16:3047–3050. 2017;
19. Li PK, Shao ZH, Wang Q, Cheng YJ. Frequency- and pattern-reconfigurable antenna for multistandard wireless applications. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 14:333–336. 2014;

Biography

Rekha Shanmugam is currently working as an Assistant Professor in the Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Sreenidhi Institute of Science and Technology, Hyderabad, India. She received her PhD in the area of “Design and development of substrate integrated waveguide antennas” from Karunya Institute of Science and Technology, Coimbatore in 2019. She has 7 years of teaching and 5 years of Research experience. Her research areas include wireless sensor networks, antenna design (especially substrate integrated waveguide antennas), reconfigurable antennas, and MIMO antennas. She has more than 12 publications in internal conferences and journals, including Microwave and Optical technology letters (Wiley), International Journal of RF and Microwave computer Aided engineering (Wiley). She is a lifetime member of the CSI and a member of IEEE (Antenna and Propagation Society).

Article information Continued

Fig. 1

Geometry of proposed model.

Fig. 2

Equivalent circuit of PIN diode in (a) ON, (b) OFF state, and (c) lumped RLC boundary in HFSS.

Fig. 3

Simulated surface current density of the proposed design at (a) 2.4 GHz, (b) 5.3 GHz, (c) 3.3 GHz, (d) 5.9 GHz, and (e) 4 GHz.

Fig. 4

Vector surface current distribution at 2.4 GHz (phase 0°).

Fig. 5

Effects of stub at higher frequencies: (a) forward bias and (b) reverse bias.

Fig. 6

A photograph of the fabricated antenna: (a) front view and (b) rear view.

Fig. 7

Return loss at (a) zero bias, (b) forward bias, and (c) reverse bias.

Fig. 8

Measured gain of proposed antenna.

Fig. 9

Efficiency of proposed antenna.

Fig. 10

Simulated and measured gains of E- and H-planes at (a) 2.4 GHz, (b) 5.4 GHz, (c) 3.3 GHz, (d) 6 GHz, and (e) 4.1 GHz

Table 1

Dimensions of proposed design

S. No. Dimension Value (mm)
1 L × W 40 × 35
2 h 33.5
3 t 4
4 a 11
5 b 6
6 c 17
7 d 9
8 e 3
9 f 9.5

Table 2

Different configurations of PIN diodes with their simulated operating frequencies

DC bias (V) Biasing state Operating freq. (GHz) Bandwidth (GHz)
Case 1 0 Zero bias 4 3.6–4.8
Case 2 +3 Forward bias 2.4 2.1–2.5
5.3 5.0–5.6
Case 3 −3 Reverse bias 3.3 2.8–3.6
5.9 5.5–6.1

Table 3

Summary of simulated and measured results of the proposed antenna

Parameter Simulated results Measured results


Forward bias Reverse bias Zero bias Forward bias Reverse bias Zero bias
Frequency (GHz) 2.4 5.3 3.3 5.9 4 2.47 5.4 3.38 6 4.1
Return loss (dB) −16.8 −15.6 −16.7 −17.7 −16.4 −19.8 −18.6 −19.8 −19.6 −18.5
Gain (dBi) 4.5 2.4 2.8 2.4 2.7 5 2.7 3.1 2.6 3
Bandwidth (GHz) 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.6 1.1 0.4 0.6 0.9 0.8 1.2
Efficiency (%) 83 75 78 74 77 85 78 80 76 79

Table 4

Performance comparison between proposed antenna and those in the literature

Reference Year Dimension (mm×mm) Number of switches/diodes and operating bands Frequency of operation (GHz) Gain (dBi) Application
[17] 2017 35 × 53 1, triple 2.45, 3.5, 5.2 1.7–3.4 Wi-Fi, WiMAX, WLAN
[18] 2017 50 × 50 4, quad 4.2, 4.8, 5.2, 5.8 3.2–4 Wireless communication service, Telemetry, WLAN
[19] 2014 80 × 45.8 5, dual 2.4, 5.4 2.6–5 WLAN
[5] 2020 60 × 100 2, dual 0.430–1, 1–5 2.98 (max) Cognitive radio
[14] 2016 35 × 40 1, triple 2.45, 3.5, 5.2 1.48–3.26 Wi-Fi, WLAN, WLAN
Proposed work 2020 40 × 35 1, penta 2.4, 3.3, 5.3, 5.9, 4 2.6–5 WLAN, 5G