Miniaturized Antenna Design for Dual-Band Wi-Fi 6/6E Applications Using the Ground Radiation Technique

Article information

J. Electromagn. Eng. Sci. 2025;25(2):202-204
Publication date (electronic) : 2025 March 31
doi : https://doi.org/10.26866/jees.2025.2.l.25
1Communications Research Institute, Sangshin Elecom Co. Ltd., Sejong, Republic of Korea
2Department of Electronics and Information Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology at Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China
3Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Aerospace Communication and Networking Technology, Harbin Institute of Technology at Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China
4Department of Electronic Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
5Department of Automation, Shandong University of Science and Technology at Jinan, Jinan, China
6Department of Cosmetic Science, Kwangju Women’s University, Kwangju, Republic of Korea
*Corresponding Author: Hyeongdong Kim (e-mail: hdkim@hanyang.ac.kr)
Rui Li and Longyue Qu contributed equally to this work.
ahttps://orcid.org/0009-0009-1641-309X
bhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5152-091X
chttps://orcid.org/0009-0002-9957-2721
dhttps://orcid.org/0009-0006-1690-1227
ehttps://orcid.org/0009-0005-7879-6584
fhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4540-9451
Received 2023 December 6; Revised 2024 February 15; Accepted 2024 August 4.

Abstract

In this letter, we construct a novel compact multi-resonance antenna structure using the ground radiation technique to achieve the intended target frequencies of 2.4–2.5 GHz and (5.125–7.125 GHz) the Wi-Fi 6/6E dual-band. According to the measurement results, under a 3:1 voltage standing wave ratio, the proposed antenna achieved a bandwidth of 450 MHz (ranging from 2.20 GHz to 2.65 GHz) in the lower band, maintaining an average total efficiency of 60.7% from 2.4 GHz to 2.5 GHz. Furthermore, a bandwidth of 2,640 MHz (ranging from 4.81 GHz to 7.45 GHz) was achieved in the higher band, with the average total efficiency being 53.4% from 5.0 GHz to 7.125 GHz. The measured antenna radiation pattern also showed satisfactory antenna radiation performance. Overall, the proposed antenna displays strong potential for use in mobile communication applications.

I. Introduction

Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) and Wi-Fi 6E (802.11az) are recent wireless network technologies that offer both faster speed and wider coverage. In addition, this technology uses more channels, leading to a better overall experience for internet users. A larger number of channels reduces the signal-to-noise ratio, thereby improving throughput and response time to offer high-quality network connections to users [1, 2]. However, the demand for miniaturization of mobile devices is increasing rapidly, necessitating a further decrease in the antenna area. Notably, a decrease in antenna input impedance variation by the area of the antenna [1] leads to a relative decline in antenna performance and bandwidth. To address this issue, previous studies [36] have either resorted to a larger antenna size or attained a bandwidth that does not sufficiently cover the entire frequency of Wi-Fi 6/6E bands. Therefore, developing miniaturized antennas that offer high efficiency, wide bandwidth, and good performance remains a common challenge for antenna designers.

In this letter, we propose a novel compact multi-resonance antenna structure that uses the ground radiation technique to achieve wideband coverage in the target frequency of 2.4–2.5 GHz and (5.125–7.125 GHz) Wi-Fi 6/6E dual band. According to the measurement results, the proposed antenna achieved a −6 dB bandwidth of 450 MHz (ranging from 2.20 GHz to 2.65 GHz) in the lower band, along with an average total efficiency of 60.7%, and a −6 dB bandwidth of 2,640 MHz (ranging from 4.81 GHz to 7.45 GHz) in the higher band, with an average total efficiency of 53.4%. Overall, the proposed miniaturized antenna exhibits strong prospects for implementation in the advancement of mobile communication applications.

II. Antenna Design and Operation Mechanism

The proposed antenna is composed of a 40 mm × 80 mm × 1 mm board set on an FR-4 (Frame Retardant Type 4) substrate (ɛr = 4.4, tanδ = 0.02), as shown in Fig. 1(a). It was designed with a 6 mm × 8 mm clearance from the ground plane. As shown in Fig. 1(b), a 2.5 mm × 4 mm feeding structure was employed, along with a series chip capacitor Cf (0.38 pF), parallel chip capacitor Cs (0.1 pF), shunt chip capacitor Ca (0.31 pF), and shunt chip inductor Lf (1.1 nH) to control the impedance matching of the proposed antenna. In particular, the central loop resonance frequency of the lower band (2.4 GHz) was controlled by chip capacitor Cr (0.62 pF), while the central LfCh loop resonance frequency of the higher band (5.0–7.125 GHz) was controlled by chip capacitor Ch (0.055 pF). Furthermore, an increase in antenna clearance led to an increase in inductance, accompanied by a decline in loop resonance frequency. To explain the operating principle of the proposed antenna when using the ground radiation technique in the lower and higher bands, Fig. 2 shows the simulated reflection coefficient of the proposed antenna with regard to variations in chip capacitors Cr and Ch. As shown in Fig. 2(a) and 2(b), the reflection coefficient of both the lower band and higher band changed significantly with an increase in the values of chip capacitors Cr and Ch.

Fig. 1

Geometries of (a) the antenna ground plane and (b) the proposed antenna structure.

Fig. 2

Simulated reflection coefficient of the proposed antenna when using different chip capacitor values: (a) different Cr values in the lower band and (b) different Ch values in the higher band.

Drawing on the reaction theorem, the ground radiation technique was used for the proposed antenna by considering the entire ground plane as a radiator that forms a dipole-type radiator that can excite the ground plane [7, 8]. Notably, ground-radiation antenna technology can be applied to different situations featuring various kinds of evaluation boards and frequency antenna designs. Moreover, it offers high efficiency, target frequency coverage, and good antenna performance [3, 68]. The relationship between the ground plane and the proposed antenna can be expressed using the modal excitation coefficient, formulated as follows [7]:

(1) H¯ground,M¯antenna=-H¯ground·M¯antennadτ,

where ground is the magnetic field emanating from the ground plane and antenna is the magnetic current produced by the antenna. The antenna was coupled with the ground plane, while the loop type current (antenna) reacted with the ground plane magnetic field (ground) [7, 8]. To further investigate the principle of the proposed antenna, the simulated surface current distributions of the operating current modes in the lower and higher bands were evaluated, as shown in Fig. 3. It is observed that the current in Loops 1 and 2 in the feeding structure controls the lower band input impedance matching using the small ground radiator loop, thus achieving a wider impedance bandwidth in the lower band. Simultaneously, the current in Loops 3 and 4 controls the higher band input impedance matching by means of the LfCh radiator loop, attaining a wider impedance bandwidth in the higher band.

Fig. 3

Simulated surface current distribution of the proposed antenna in the lower band (2.4 GHz) and the higher band (5.125–7.125 GHz).

III. Simulation and Experimental Results

The proposed antenna was fabricated and measured using Agilent 8753ES network analyzers and a 3D CITA OTA chamber (sized 6 m × 3 m × 3 m), as shown in Fig. 4. The antenna structure was relatively compact and easy to operate. Furthermore, the use of 0603-type capacitors and inductors for impedance matching in the measurement facilitated operations and did not pose much difficulty in terms of antenna engraving and printing. The simulation and measurement results obtained using the proposed antenna reflection coefficient are shown in Fig. 5. The simulation results show that the −6 dB bandwidth achieved for the lower band was 220 MHz (ranging from 2.33 GHz to 2.55 GHz), while that for the higher band was 2,470 MHz (ranging from 4.98 GHz to 7.45 GHz). Notably, a −6 dB bandwidth corresponding to the 3:1 voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR) is generally accounted for in most studies, although the 2:1 VSWR (–10 dB bandwidth) has also been used in some cases [1, 3, 6, 8, 9]. Furthermore, as per the measured results, −6 dB bandwidths of 450 MHz (ranging from 2.20 GHz to 2.65 GHz) and 2,640 MHz (ranging from 4.81 GHz to 7.45 GHz) were achieved for the lower band and the higher band, respectively. Fig. 5 indicates that the lower band attained an average total efficiency of 60.7% from 2.4 GHz to 2.5 GHz, while the higher band achieved 53.4% from 5.0 GHz to 7.125 GHz. In addition, Fig. 6 shows the measured far-field radiation patterns of the proposed antenna at 2.47 GHz and 5.60 GHz. Both the E-theta and E-phi components are present in the xz- and yz-planes, indicating good radiation performance. Table 1 presents the results obtained from comparing the proposed antenna with those used in previous studies with regard to their overall size, bandwidth, efficiency, operating frequency, and antenna type. It is evident that the proposed antenna attained a wider bandwidth and approximately the same efficiency as the other antennas operating in the same frequency band proposed by previous studies [36, 9, 10]. Moreover, the proposed antenna allows easier manipulation of impedance matching compared to previous studies.

Fig. 4

Prototype of the fabricated antenna.

Fig. 5

Simulated and measured reflection coefficients and measured total efficiency values of the proposed antenna.

Fig. 6

Measured radiation patterns of the proposed antenna in the xz- and yz-planes at 2.47 GHz (a) and 5.60 GHz (b).

Comparison with previous studies

IV. Conclusion

In this letter, we propose a novel compact multi-resonance antenna structure constructed using the ground-radiation technique. The proposed antenna achieved the intended target frequency bands of 2.4–2.5 GHz and (5.125–7.125 GHz) the Wi-Fi 6/6E dual band. Furthermore, the measurement results, calculated considering a 3:1 voltage standing wave ratio, show that the proposed antenna achieved a bandwidth of 450 MHz (ranging from 2.20 GHz to 2.65 GHz) in the lower band, with an average total efficiency of 60.7% from 2.4 GHz to 2.5 GHz. It also achieved a bandwidth of 2,640 MHz (ranging from 4.81 to 7.45 GHz) in the higher band, with an average total efficiency of 53.4% from 5.0 GHz to 7.125 GHz. Overall, it is established that the proposed antenna has significant potential for use in mobile communication applications.

Notes

This study was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea through a grant from the Korean government (Minis-try of Science and ICT) (No. 2019R1F1A1063993).

References

1. Piao H., Jin Y., Qu L.. A compact and straightforward self-decoupled MIMO antenna system for 5G applications. IEEE Access 8(10):129236–129245. 2020;https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3008966.
2. Zhang W., Li Y., Wei K., Zhang Z.. A two-port microstrip antenna with high isolation for Wi-Fi 6 and Wi-Fi 6E applications. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 70(7):5227–5234. 2022;https://doi.org/10.1109/TAP.2022.3145439.
3. Qu L., Zhang R., Kim H. H., Kim H.. Compact dual-band antenna using inverted-L and inner rectangular loop for WLAN applications. Electronics Letters 51(23):1843–1844. 2015;https://doi.org/10.1049/el.2015.2075.
4. Yu J., Zhang R., Liu Y., Kim H. H., Kim H.. Dual-band WLAN antenna design by controlling higher order mode characteristic. Microwave and Optical Technology Letters 55(8):1897–1902. 2013;https://doi.org/10.1002/mop.27718.
5. Nguyen T. D., Lee Y., Jung C. W.. Transparent and flexible patch antenna using MMF for conformal Wi-Fi 6E applications. Journal of Electromagnetic Engineering and Science 23(4):310–317. 2023;https://doi.org/10.26866/jees.2023.4.r.172.
6. Jeon J., Zahid Z., Kim H.. Dual band loop-type ground radiation antenna for mobile devices. Microwave and Optical Technology Letters 58(3):666–668. 2016;https://doi.org/10.1002/mop.29648.
7. Wi S., Lee H., Kim J., Li R., Shin H., Kim H.. Improved ground radiation antenna performance for a vertically attach PCB. Journal of Electromagnetic Engineering and Science 23(5):452–454. 2023;https://doi.org/10.26866/jees.2023.5.l.18.
8. Li R., Qu L., Kim H.. A compact MIMO antenna design using the wideband ground-radiation technique for 5G terminals. Journal of Electromagnetic Engineering and Science 24(1):89–97. 2024;https://doi.org/10.26866/jees.2024.1.r.208.
9. Juan P. H., Su S. W.. EMC hybrid loop/monopole LDS antenna with three-sided ground walls for 2.4/5/6 GHz WLAN operation. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 22(9):2200–2204. 2023;https://doi.org/10.1109/LAWP.2023.3281457.
10. Sim C. Y. D., Dhasarathan V., Tran T. K., Kulkarni J., Garner B. A., Li Y.. Mutual coupling reduction in dual-band MIMO antenna using parasitic dollar-shaped structure for modern wireless communication. IEEE Access 11:5617–5628. 2023;https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3235761.

Article information Continued

Fig. 1

Geometries of (a) the antenna ground plane and (b) the proposed antenna structure.

Fig. 2

Simulated reflection coefficient of the proposed antenna when using different chip capacitor values: (a) different Cr values in the lower band and (b) different Ch values in the higher band.

Fig. 3

Simulated surface current distribution of the proposed antenna in the lower band (2.4 GHz) and the higher band (5.125–7.125 GHz).

Fig. 4

Prototype of the fabricated antenna.

Fig. 5

Simulated and measured reflection coefficients and measured total efficiency values of the proposed antenna.

Fig. 6

Measured radiation patterns of the proposed antenna in the xz- and yz-planes at 2.47 GHz (a) and 5.60 GHz (b).

Table 1

Comparison with previous studies

Study Overall size (mm) BW (MHz)a Antenna average efficiency (%)a Operating frequency (GHz) Antenna type
Qu et al. [3] 100 × 50 × 1 120 / 1,260 (−10 dB) 69 / 61 2.4 / 5 Loop
Juan and Su [9] 180 × 310 × 1 2.4 GHz and 5–7 GHz cover (−6 dB) 38–53 / 60–77 2.4 / 5 / 6 LDS antenna
Yu et al. [4] 45 × 20 × 1 700 / 1,000 (−6 dB) 69 / 61 2.4 / 5 Monopole
Nguyen et al. [5] 50 × 50 × 2 110 / 1,170 (−6 dB) 63 / 68 2.4 / 6 Patch
Sim et al. [10] 20 × 30 × 0.8 150 / 3,080 (−10 dB) 70 / 70 2.39–2.57 / 3.82–6.95 DRA
Jeon et al [6] 60 × 128 × 1 850 / 700 (−6 dB) 71.4 / 53.6 2.4 / 5 Loop
Proposed 40 × 80 × 1 450 / 2,640 (−6 dB) 60.7 / 53.4 2.4 / 5 / 6 Loop
a

Measured data in two ranges, 2.4 GHz / 5–7 GHz.