J. Electromagn. Eng. Sci Search

CLOSE


J. Electromagn. Eng. Sci > Volume 25(3); 2025 > Article
Kim, Wi, Lee, Li, Shin, Kim, and Kim: Antenna Sensitivity Enhancement through Noise Suppression in an LTE/GPS Communication Module

Abstract

This letter discusses antenna sensitivity enhancement in an LTE/GPS communication module for vehicle-to-everything applications by addressing onboard noise suppression. The performance of antennas in smart vehicles is increasingly complex due to the concentration of electronic devices within small structures, which impacts signal reception. Onboard noise generated by other unknown electronic components on the PCB can couple through the resonance structure of the other antenna, significantly degrading performance. The proposed solution includes an equivalent noise circuit and two double-branch planar inverted-F antennas targeting the B1 and B5 LTE bands and the L1 and L5 GPS bands. The noise circuit can couple with the GPS antenna’s feed loop and requires a noise suppression method to prevent sensitivity degradation. The analysis shows that this approach can increase total isotropic sensitivity from −81.79 dB to −94.61 dB, representing a significant enhancement in antenna sensitivity performance.

Introduction

As the development of vehicle-to-everything (V2X) technology accelerates, antenna performance requirements for smart vehicles are becoming increasingly complex [1, 2]. Antenna sensitivity is affected by the concentration of various electronic devices in small structures. Studies have explored how to improve antenna sensitivity through isolation from external factors because sensitivity directly influences the ability to receive signals [35]. However, electronic devices with internal antennas suffer greatly from onboard noise sources that are unintentionally generated by other electric components inside the printed circuit board (PCB). Moreover, onboard noise can be coupled with other resonances on the board, further reducing antenna performance.
This letter discusses the enhancement of antenna sensitivity through onboard noise suppression in an LTE/GPS communication module for V2X communication. The proposed module contains an equivalent noise circuit, which represents unexpected onboard noise, and two double-branch planar inverted-F antennas (PIFAs) targeting the B1 (2,100 MHz) and B5 (850 MHz) LTE communication bands and the L1 (1,575 MHz) and L5 (1,175 MHz) GPS communication bands. Each PIFA contains two radiation branches with different resonance frequencies sharing an identical feed loop, which exists for impedance matching [6]. In this application, a noise circuit with a resonance frequency of 850 MHz can couple with the feed loop of the GPS antenna, and the magnitude of the coupling will be stronger as the resonance frequency of the feed loop approaches that of the operating band. For this reason, a noise suppression method must be implemented to avoid antenna sensitivity degradation due to the coupling of the noise sources.

Module Design and Noise Suppression

Fig. 1 illustrates the overall communication module and the simulated model with a specific antenna structure and an equivalent noise circuit. The module was set to be 100 mm × 50 mm with a 1 mm-thick FR4 substrate (ɛr = 4.4), which is a commonly used vehicle tracker size. The simulation was conducted using the Ansys High-Frequency Structure Simulator (HFSS) tool in the driven modal solution type. The double-branch PIFA was designed in the upper left corner to operate in the B1 and B5 LTE communication bands, where LL1 = 18 nH, LL2 = 5 nH, and CL = 2.2 pF. The branch containing LL1 was set to adjust the resonance frequency to 850 MHz to operate in the B5 band. The magnitude of CL can control the input impedance as the resonance frequency of the feed loop gets closer to the radiation branch, creating greater coupling.
An additional radiation branch containing LL2 was inserted to operate in the B1 band. Another double-branch PIFA was designed in the upper right side to operate the L1 and L5 GPS communication bands, where LG1 = 9 nH, LG2 = 23 nH, and CG = 1.0 pF. This was designed in mirror symmetry to the LTE antenna and with an identical operating mechanism. A noise equivalent circuit was inserted on the right side of the ground plane, where the capacitor CN = 1.3 pF was used to set the resonance frequency of the B1 band. By defining the LTE antenna as port 1, GPS antenna as port 2, and noise circuit as port 3, Z13 can be written as follows [7]:
(1)
Z13=Z13-Z12Z23Z22+ZL,
where Z13 and Z13 are the mutual impedances with and without the GPS antenna, Z12 and Z23 are the mutual impedances between the GPS antenna and the LTE antenna and the noise circuit, respectively, and Z22 and ZL are the self-impedance and terminated load impedance at the GPS antenna. Z13 is a negligible value because the LTE antenna and the noise source are isolated. By comparing Z13 and Z13, the effect of the noise source coupling with the LTE antenna through the reference GPS antenna and the modified GPS can be estimated. If the resonance frequency of the feed loop of the GPS antenna approaches that of the noise circuit, Z22 + ZL approaches zero, and Z13 is strongly impacted. In other words, antenna sensitivity degradation is exacerbated by the coupling of the noise source and the GPS antenna. To suppress the sensitivity degradation effect, it is necessary to isolate the coupling between the GPS feed loop and the noise circuit by tuning the resonance frequency.
Fig. 2 shows the simulated current distribution of the GPS antenna with different capacitance values. When CG = 1 pF, the resonance frequency of the feed loop approached 850 MHz, and the magnitude of the loop resonance current was strengthened. This resulted in the maximization of Z12Z23/(Z22 + ZL), where Z22 + ZL approached zero. When CG = 0.05 pF, the magnitude of Z22 + ZL significantly increased, making Z12Z23/(Z22 + ZL) negligible value.
Fig. 3 represents the simulated reflection coefficient comparison of the LTE antenna for the cases of Cg = 1.0 pF and Cg = 0.05 pF in the GPS antenna and without an equivalent noise circuit. A resonance of the feed loop of the GPS antenna that could be coupled with the equivalent noise circuit antenna was observed when Cg = 1.0 pF. The reflection coefficient was fairly close to the case without a noise circuit when Cg = 0.05 pF. By tuning the resonance frequency of the feed loop, noise coupling could be avoided.
Fig. 4 shows the simulated reflection coefficient and the measured total efficiency comparison of the GPS antenna between the cases of Cg = 1.0 pF and Cg = 0.05 pF. Changing the capacitance value led to an impedance mismatch, which resulted in a degradation of the total efficiency. However, the difference in the peak total efficiency between the two cases was less than 8%, which is not crucial for GPS antenna performance.
Table 1 shows the active test results, including the measured total radiated power (TRP) and total isotropic sensitivity (TIS) values in dBm for the proposed LTE antenna. TRP is the sum of all power radiated by an antenna, and TIS refers to the lowest detectable received signal strength. These values were calculated as follows [8]:
(2)
TRP=Pcond+Efficiency,
(3)
TIS=Scond-Sinterference-Efficiency,
where generally used units of TRP, TIS, Pcond, Scond, Sinterference are in dBm, and efficiency is in dB. Pcond and Scond, the conducted power and sensitivity from the commercial IC chip, were 22 dBm and −99 dBm, respectively, for the proposed application. These results imply that the IC chip generates a signal level of 22 dBm to the antenna input in transmitting mode and recognizes the signal, which is stronger than −99 dBm, in receiving mode. It is noted that lower TIS leads to better antenna sensitivity. Sinterference is determined by noise coupling within the onboard noise source. For the TIS data comparison at the B5 band, the coupled noise source was suppressed by tuning the resonance frequency of the feed loop of the GPS antenna. In other words, Sinterference was reduced, resulting in a TIS improvement of more than 12 dB.

Conclusion

In this letter, an onboard noise suppression method in an LTE/GPS communication module is proposed. This letter focused on antenna sensitivity degradation caused by unintentional noise source amplification and a method to avoid it. The analysis results showed that TIS increased from −81.79 dB to −94.61 dB, demonstrating the effectiveness of the noise suppression method in enhancing antenna performance.

Fig. 1
Proposed antenna design with (a) a fabricated board, (b) a simulated model, (c) an LTE antenna, (d) a GPS antenna, and (e) an equivalent noise circuit.
jees-2025-3-l-26f1.jpg
Fig. 2
Current distribution of the GPS antenna at 850 MHz when (a) Cg = 1.0 pF and (b) Cg = 0.05 pF.
jees-2025-3-l-26f2.jpg
Fig. 3
Simulated reflection coefficient (S11) of the LTE antenna.
jees-2025-3-l-26f3.jpg
Fig. 4
Simulated reflection coefficient (S11) and the measured total efficiency of the GPS antenna.
jees-2025-3-l-26f4.jpg
Table 1
Measured TRP and TIS of the LTE antenna for the B1 and B5 bands (unit: dBm)
Cg = 1.0 pF Cg = 0.05 pF
B1 band TRP 19.40 18.70
TIS −90.45 −91.63
B5 band TRP 19.10 20.46
TIS −81.79 −94.61

References

1. M. A. Sufian, N. Hussain, A. Abbas, J. Lee, S. G. Park, and N. Kim, "Mutual coupling reduction of a circularly polarized MIMO antenna using parasitic elements and DGS for V2X communications," IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 56388–56400, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3177886
crossref
2. A. Chletsou, E. Newsom, and J. Papapolymerou, "Experimental characterization of a helical antenna integrated in the rear of a vehicle for C-V2X communications," IEEE Journal of Microwaves, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 1147–1153, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1109/JMW.2023.3313115
crossref
3. L. Qu, R. Zhang, and H. Kim, "High-sensitivity ground radiation antenna system using an adjacent slot for Bluetooth headsets," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 63, no. 12, pp. 5903–5907, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAP.2015.2481919
crossref
4. H. Lee, L. Qu, and H. Kim, "Antenna sensitivity enhancement using ground shorting pin," Microwave and Optical Technology Letters, vol. 60, no. 7, pp. 1630–1632, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1002/mop.31210
crossref
5. D. Park, J. Jeon, and H. Kim, "Antenna sensitivity variation depending on the installation of a shield can," Microwave and Optical Technology Letters, vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 2311–2315, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1002/mop.32291
crossref
6. C. R. Rowell and R. D. Murch, "A compact PIFA suitable for dual-frequency 900/1800-MHz operation," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 596–598, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1109/8.664127
crossref
7. B. K. Lau and J. B. Andersen, "Simple and efficient decoupling of compact arrays with parasitic scatterers," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 464–472, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAP.2011.2173440
crossref
8. Z. Zhang, "Internal antenna," Antenna Design for Mobile Devices. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2017. p.138–228. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119132332
crossref
TOOLS
Share :
Facebook Twitter Linked In Google+
METRICS Graph View
  • 0 Crossref
  • 0 Scopus
  • 130 View
  • 31 Download
Related articles in JEES

ABOUT
ARTICLE CATEGORY

Browse all articles >

BROWSE ARTICLES
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Editorial Office
#706 Totoo Valley, 217 Saechang-ro, Yongsan-gu, Seoul 04376, Korea
Tel: +82-2-337-9666    Fax: +82-2-6390-7550    E-mail: admin-jees@kiees.or.kr                

Copyright © 2025 by The Korean Institute of Electromagnetic Engineering and Science.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next