J. Electromagn. Eng. Sci Search

CLOSE


J. Electromagn. Eng. Sci > Volume 26(4); 2026 > Article
Nguyen, Nguyen, Nguyen, and Le: Dual-Band GPS Antenna for Agriculture Robot Positioning Application

Abstract

This paper presents a novel dual-band global positioning system (GPS) antenna specifically designed for agricultural robotics applications. The antenna features a compact design, integrating an F-shaped feed, an annular ground plane, and a reflector cavity. Measuring only 0.327λ0 × 0.327λ0 × 0.129λ0, the antenna demonstrates excellent performance across both GPS bands. It achieves a measured −10 dB reflection coefficient bandwidth of 3.81% at 1.575 GHz and 4.89% at 1.227 GHz. Furthermore, the antenna exhibits a commendable efficiency of up to 74%, with realized gains of 2.889 dBi and 3.633 dBi at the respective frequencies. A key advantage of this antenna is its stable performance when integrated with metallic agricultural robots. Its efficacy in GPS positioning systems is validated by achieving a competitive accuracy of 0.010 meters, comparable to commercial U-blox antennas.

I. Introduction

In the context of modern agriculture, the integration of advanced technologies to enhance productivity and operational efficiency has become an inevitable trend. Agricultural robots, equipped with intelligent automation and control systems, play a crucial role in reducing labor requirements, optimizing farming processes, and improving accuracy in tasks such as planting, harvesting, and crop monitoring. To achieve high precision and efficiency in outdoor environments, these robots must be equipped with a robust and stable real-time kinematic global positioning system (GPS-RTK) [1]. The GPS-RTK system not only provides precise location information but also enables robots to maintain their trajectories, avoid obstacles, and perform tasks autonomously. Particularly in agricultural settings, where large-scale fields and complex terrain conditions are common, the demand for an accurate positioning system becomes even more critical.
A key factor influencing the performance of the GPS system is the antenna. Dual-band GPS antennas (1.227 GHz for L2 and 1.575 GHz for L1) [2] have the capability to receive signals from a greater number of satellites, thereby enhancing the accuracy and stability of the positioning system [3]. In areas with weak or obstructed signals, dual-band antennas effectively mitigate errors and improve connectivity reliability. The design and development of a dedicated dual-band GPS antenna for agricultural robots not only fulfills the requirement for high accuracy but also ensures compatibility and efficiency within specific working environments.
Currently, numerous studies have been conducted on dualband GPS antennas with various structural configurations [416]. In [4], researchers used two stacked square patches with truncated corners placed on a double-layer fractal electromagnetic band gap (EBG) substrate. This design, utilizing low-cost FR4 material, successfully provided full GPS bandwidth coverage. Despite its features, it has a large footprint of 130 mm × 130 mm. Another study [5] describes an antenna built on a multi-layer low-temperature co-fired ceramic (LTCC) substrate. This configuration features two stacked patches: the bottom patch handles lower frequencies and acts as the ground for the top patch, which operates at higher frequencies and connects directly to the probe. However, this study overlooks the size of the ground plane. The antenna achieves dual-band functionality by utilizing a patch mode for the L2 band and a slot mode for the L1 band [7]. It also incorporates additional slot stubs, allowing for independent tuning of the L1 frequency. The use of high-dielectric, low-loss substrates and meander slot designs are employed to enhance the antenna’s performance and manufacturability. A miniature coupled double loop (CDL) antenna is introduced for dual-band GPS applications [8]. This antenna’s design incorporates lumped capacitors and inductive pins on a Rogers TMM10i substrate with moderately high permittivity. This configuration aims to concurrently achieve a smaller size, high radiation efficiency, and appropriate spacing between the L2 and L1 band resonance frequencies.
Meanwhile, the researcher in [9] proposed a compact quadband inverted F/L antenna (QIFLA) with right-hand circular polarization (RHCP), comprising four helical dual-band antennas. Traditional multi-band four-port CP antennas tend to be large, making frequency tuning and impedance matching more challenging. The inverted F and L antennas incorporate inductive, capacitive, and resistive elements to achieve resonance. The author in [10] designed a compact dual-coupled short-circuit probe-loaded (DCSP) patch antenna with dimensions of λ0/8.8 × λ0/8.8 × λ0/19. This dual short-circuit probe structure functions as two parallel LC loads integrated into the patch antenna.
Studies [1113] examined antennas with various slot configurations. The work in [11] introduced an antenna based on the reduced surface wave (RSW) mechanism, minimizing susceptibility to low-angle multipath interference compared to conventional high-precision GPS antennas. The author in [12] developed a circularly polarized, single-fed slotted patch antenna featuring an S-shaped slot at the center of the square patch radiator for dual-band operation. A single microstrip feed line is positioned beneath a coupled aperture ground plane, allowing frequency ratio control by adjusting slot arm length.
Additionally, research on antenna isolation has been conducted. Study [14] introduced a tag structure with a reflecting plane and an air gap to enhance directivity. Study [15] explored transmitter-receiver isolation, utilizing a metamaterial cavity composed of metal reflectors and a two-layer complementary metasurface to improve isolation by up to 10 dB over the 2.5–2.7 GHz range. Lastly, the author in [16] examined an ultra-high frequency (UHF) folded tag antenna with a U-shaped impedance matching structure designed for metal surfaces, achieving a maximum theoretical reading distance of 3.6 m. The aforementioned studies have designed dual-band GPS antennas. However, certain limitations persist, such as large size [12, 17], narrow bandwidth [8, 9], and the use of high permittivity substrates [8]. Additionally, some results are only based on simulations and have not yet undergone fabrication and measurement [18].
In this paper, a compact, dual-band antenna utilizing a low-cost substrate for GPS applications in agricultural robots is designed and fabricated. The technique employs stubs combined with a slotted square DGS to generate two resonant bands while simultaneously miniaturizing the antenna size. A cavity is used to significantly reduce backward radiation, improve forward radiation, and simultaneously isolate the antenna’s influence from other components within the robot. Section II outlines the design considerations, while Section III presents the experimental results. The paper concludes with a summary of findings.

II. Antenna Design

Fig. 1 illustrates the geometric structure of the proposed antenna. Its two main components are a square radiating element and a square cavity, with dimensions of g and g2, respectively. The radiating element is formed by four stubs along with a microstrip line mounted on one side and a DGS structure consisting of two square slots mounted on the opposite side. This combination not only creates a dual-band antenna but also helps reduce its size. However, it introduces the limitation of significant back radiation. Therefore, a cavity is attached to the rear of the antenna to overcome this drawback.
The simulated surface current distribution results (using CST Studio Suite 2021 software) at phase = 0° in Fig. 2 show that the dual-band characteristic is primarily determined by two square slots. At lower frequencies, the surface current distribution is more concentrated in the larger slot, while at higher frequencies, it’s concentrated in the smaller slot. Notably, the surface current distribution at both frequencies is mainly focused on the edges of each slot. This, combined with the relatively large size of the DGS structure, means that the dimensions of the slots have minimal impact on the antenna’s input impedance and resonant frequency. Therefore, during the parameter study, the central and middle metal squares were partially cut with isosceles right triangles, whose square sides were x and y, respectively. The results of the S11 parameter study with respect to x are shown in Fig. 3(e). With x = 5 mm (equivalent to a = 5√2 mm), the antenna’s S11 achieves the best results at two frequency bands. The same phenomenon occurs when y = 10 mm (b = 10√2 mm).
The front section of the antenna’s radiating element comprises the feed structure and four stubs (stub 1, stub 2, stub 3, and stub 4). Both their dimensions and placement impact the input impedance, which in turn influences the antenna’s resonant frequency. Fig. 3 illustrates the S11 investigation results, detailing how stub size and position affect the antenna’s S11.
The dimensions of stub 1 and stub 2 significantly affect the resonant frequency at 1.227 GHz, whereas the resonant frequency at 1.575 GHz is primarily determined by the position of stub 3, in conjunction with stub 4 and the slots. The electromagnetic interaction between stub 3 and stub 4 enables fine-tuning of the 1.575 GHz resonant frequency without impacting the resonance at 1.227 GHz. A parametric study was conducted on key variables, including ws1, ws2, ws3, ws4, and d3, to evaluate their effects on the antenna’s performance as shown in Fig. 3.
Each stub contributes differently to the antenna’s overall performance. Stub 1 and stub 4 (the lower section of stub 1) influence both resonant frequencies, whereas stub 2 and stub 3 primarily affect only one of the two resonant frequencies when appropriately positioned. When ws1 increases (i.e., when the upper part of stub 1 is widened), the lower resonant frequency tends to decrease, while the higher frequency splits into two distinct resonance points. Conversely, when ws5 increases (i.e., when the lower part of stub 1 is extended), both the lower and higher resonant frequencies increase, with S11 deepening, indicating improved impedance matching.
It is evident that as stub 3 is positioned farther from the feed point, the high resonant frequency decreases, whereas the low resonant frequency remains unaffected. Since d3 is appropriately placed, it influences only the higher frequency, making it a key parameter for high-frequency tuning. To enhance this tuning capability, stub 4 is introduced at a position farther from the feed point than stub 3, ensuring optimal placement. The interaction between stub 3 and stub 4 allows for precise fine-tuning of the high resonant frequency.
The impact of the reflector cavity dimensions on the antenna’s performance is illustrated in Fig. 4. The impact of the reflector cavity dimensions on the antenna’s performance is illustrated in Fig. 4. As both the cavity’s width and thickness increase, the antenna’s resonant frequency decreases. However, the cavity’s thickness affects the antenna’s resonant level more significantly than its width. The proposed antenna dimensions are shown in Table 1.

III. Experimental Results

1. Measurement Results

Fig. 5 shows the fabricated antenna and its installation on top of the robot. The radiation element and the cavity of the antenna are both printed on an FR-4 substrate (ɛ = 4.4) with a thickness of 0.8 mm. The reflection coefficient and radiation pattern were measured when the antenna was placed in open air and when it was mounted on the robot. The results show that the antenna resonates well at the two central frequencies, L1 and L2, regardless of whether it is tested in free space or installed on the robot’s roof, as shown in Fig. 6.
The radiation pattern measurement configuration of the proposed antenna is shown in Fig. 7. It consists of a Keysight ENA E5063A vector network analyzer connected to the proposed antenna and a horn antenna at two ports via high-frequency cables. The measured S21 results between the two antennas are used to calculate the gain of the proposed antenna using the Friis formula. The calculated gain results are then used to plot the antenna’s radiation pattern. The simulated and measured radiation patterns of the antenna in Fig. 8 clearly demonstrate the cavity’s function. The proposed antenna’s radiation pattern with the cavity shows a significant reduction in backward radiation and a simultaneous improvement in forward radiation compared to when it’s without the cavity. The measured results show good agreement with the simulated results. Any discrepancies may be attributed to inaccuracies during the soldering and fabrication processes

2. Evaluation of the Positioning Error

A positioning system configuration using the proposed antenna and the U-blox reference antenna to evaluate positioning error is illustrated in Fig. 5(b). The system consists of a computer running the U-center software, a GPS-RTK-SMA Breakout ZED-F9P (Qwiic) module, and a Holybro SiK Telemetry Radio V3 915 MHz 500 mW. The entire setup is mounted on a robot that moves along a straight path in an outdoor environment. The position results are recorded by the U-center software and shown in Fig. 9.
The maximum positioning errors obtained using the proposed antenna and the U-blox antenna are nearly identical, measuring 7.6 cm and 7.4 cm, respectively. The U-blox antenna features RHCP polarization, an integrated LNA with an average gain of 21 dB, and physical dimensions of 60 mm × 82 mm × 22.5 mm (0.335λ0 × 0.245λ0 × 0.092λ0), which are comparable to those of the proposed antenna. According to its datasheet, the U-blox antenna achieves peak gains of 3.5 dBi for the L1 band and 2 dBi for the L2 band when mounted on a 15 cm diameter ground plane. These results demonstrate that the proposed antenna provides competitive performance relative to a commercial reference antenna, highlighting its potential for practical applications.
A comparison between the proposed antenna and related works is presented in Table 2. The proposed antenna has a smaller width and length than the antennas in [4], [12], [18], and [19], although its height is larger. Except for [12], the proposed antenna also exhibits a wider bandwidth than the remaining works. The antennas in [7], [8], and [9] are smaller in size but show significantly narrower bandwidths, reflecting a common trade-off in antenna design. This reflects a common tradeoff in antenna design. Overall, the proposed antenna achieves an appropriate size, wide bandwidths, and stable operation with good positioning accuracy even when mounted on metallic surfaces. This is a key advantage of the proposed design.

IV. Conclusion

In this paper, a dual-band antenna with an F-shaped feed and a reflector cavity attached to the back is proposed for use on a robot. The proposed antenna operates at the central frequencies of the L1 and L2 bands, with a high gain of over 2.5 dBi, a wide beam, and an upward direction. The high gain, along with the wide beam and upward direction, is very advantageous for receiving GPS signals. Experimental results of the GPS using the proposed antenna mounted on the robot show that the proposed antenna performs well and provides high accuracy, comparable to the U-blox antenna. With its low production cost, the proposed antenna is a promising candidate for use in agricultural robotics applications.

Notes

This work is funded under project number B2024-BKA-08.

Fig. 1
Geometry of the proposed antenna.
jees-2026-4-r-372f1.jpg
Fig. 2
The surface current with phase = 0° at 1.227 GHz (a) and 1.575 GHz (b), respectively.
jees-2026-4-r-372f2.jpg
Fig. 3
Parameter study of dimensions of the proposed antenna element: (a) ws1, (b) ws2, (c) ws3, (d) ws4, (e) x, and (f) d3.
jees-2026-4-r-372f3.jpg
Fig. 4
Parameter study of dimensions of the reflector cavity: (a) cavity’s width g2, and (b) cavity’s thickness h.
jees-2026-4-r-372f4.jpg
Fig. 5
(a) The proposed antenna prototype, (b) antenna on the top of the robot.
jees-2026-4-r-372f5.jpg
Fig. 6
Simulated and measured reflection coefficient of the proposed antenna.
jees-2026-4-r-372f6.jpg
Fig. 7
Radiation pattern measurement configuration of the proposed antenna.
jees-2026-4-r-372f7.jpg
Fig. 8
The simulated and measured radiation pattern of the proposed antenna: (a) XOZ plane at 1.227 GHz, (b) XOZ plane at 1.575 GHz, (c) YOZ plane st 1.227 GHz, and (d) YOZ plane at 1.575 GHz.
jees-2026-4-r-372f8.jpg
Fig. 9
The comparison of GPS-RTK ZED-F9P localization result using proposed antenna and U-blox antenna.
jees-2026-4-r-372f9.jpg
Table 1
Dimension parameters of the proposed antenna
Parameters Value (mm) Parameters Value (mm)
lf 25.5 g 80
wf 1.8 hg 0.035
ls1 36.1 hs 0.8
ws1 8.4 lo 48
ls2 22.2 li 27.5
ws2 4.8 do 4.5
ls3 7 di 4.7
ws3 2.6 d3 13
ls4 10.4 d4 27.1
ws4 2.6 a 52
g1 18.8 b 102
g2 70 h 30
Table 2
Comparison of proposed antenna with related work
Study Peak gain (dBi) BW (%) Dimensions (according λ0)
Bao et al. [4] 5.4/2.3 3.49/4.07 0.532 × 0.532 × 0.006
Chen and Chen [7] 3.5/3.2 3.17/3.67 0.104 × 0.104 × 0.046
Gupta and Mumcu [8] 4.9/3.1 2.22/2.12 0.114 × 0.114 × 0.052
Tae et al. [9] 2/0.5 2.54/3.26 0.205× 0.205 × 0.041
Chen and Qing [12] 5.0/5.0 12.5/16 0.346 × 0.346 × 0.091
Heidari et al. [18] 6.46/6.78 1.27/1.63 0.389 × 0.389
Hsieh et al. [19] 2.95/1.5 1.2/3.7 0.417 × 0.417 × 0.083
This work 2.66/3.38 3.81/4.89 0.327 × 0.327 × 0.129

References

1. R. Moeller, T. Deemyad, and A. Sebastian, "Autonomous navigation of an agricultural robot using RTK GPS and Pixhawk," In: Proceedings of 2020 Intermountain Engineering, Technology and Computing (IETC); Orem, UT, USA. 2020, pp 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/IETC47856.2020.9249176
crossref
2. USCG Navigation Center. NAVSTAR GPS Space Segment/Navigation User Interfaces (Doc No. IS-GPS-200), 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.navcen.uscg.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/gps/IS_GPS_200M.pdf

3. P. K. Enge, "The global positioning system: Signals, measurements, and performance," International Journal of Wireless Information Networks, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 83–105, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02106512
crossref
4. X. L. Bao, G. Ruvio, and M. J. Ammann, "Low-profile dual-frequency GPS patch antenna enhanced with dual-band EBG structure," Microwave and Optical Technology Letters, vol. 49, no. 11, pp. 2630–2634, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1002/mop.22815
crossref
5. S. Chen, G. Liu, X. Chen, T. Lin, X. Liu, and Z. Duan, "Compact dual-band GPS microstrip antenna using multilayer LTCC substrate," IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 9, pp. 421–423, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1109/LAWP.2010.2049822
crossref
6. S. X. Ta, I. Park, and R. W. Ziolkowski, "Dual-band wide-beam crossed asymmetric dipole antenna for GPS applications," Electronics Letters, vol. 48, no. 25, pp. 1580–1581, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1049/el.2012.2890
crossref
7. M. Chen and C. C. Chen, "A compact dual-band GPS antenna design," IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 12, pp. 245–248, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1109/LAWP.2013.2247972
crossref
8. S. Gupta and G. Mumcu, "Dual-band miniature coupled double loop GPS antenna loaded with lumped capacitors and inductive pins," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 61, no. 6, pp. 2904–2910, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAP.2013.2253295
crossref
9. H. S. Tae, K. S. Oh, W. I. Son, W. G. Lim, and J. W. Yu, "Design of compact dual-band quadruple inverted-F/L antenna for GPS L1/L2 band," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 2276–2279, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAP.2012.2231921
crossref
10. C. Sun, H. Zheng, and Y. Liu, "Analysis and design of a low-cost dual-band compact circularly polarized antenna for GPS application," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 365–370, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAP.2015.2501849
crossref
11. L. I. Basilio, R. L. Chen, J. T. Williams, and D. R. Jackson, "A new planar dual-band GPS antenna designed for reduced susceptibility to low-angle multipath," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 55, no. 8, pp. 2358–2366, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAP.2007.901818
crossref
12. Z. N. Chen and X. Qing, "Dual-band circularly polarized S-shaped slotted patch antenna with a small frequency-ratio," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 2112–2115, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAP.2010.2046851
crossref
13. Y. H. Yang, J. L. Guo, B. H. Sun, and Y. H. Huang, "Dual-band slot helix antenna for global positioning satellite applications," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 64, no. 12, pp. 5146–5152, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAP.2016.2623647
crossref
14. M. T. Le, T. P. Dong, T. P. Vuong, and Q. C. Nguyen, "A circularly polarized passive RFID tag on wall," In: Proceedings of 2014 IEEE Asia-Pacific Conference on Applied Electromagnetics (APACE); Johor Bahru, Malaysia. 2014, pp 83–86. https://doi.org/10.1109/APACE.2014.7043818
crossref
15. J. Li, S. Yang, C. Wang, W. T. Joines, and Q. Liu, "Metamaterial cavity for the isolation enhancement of closely positioned dual-polarized relay antenna arrays," Microwave and Optical Technology Letters, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 857–862, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1002/mop.30413
crossref
16. Z. Zhou and S. Liu, "Folded tag antenna based on U-shaped Impedance matching structure for on-metal application," In: Proceedings of 2021 International Conference on Microwave and Millimeter Wave Technology (ICMMT); Nanjing, China. 2021, pp 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMMT52847.2021.9618114
crossref
17. T. Oda, N. Iizasa, G. C. Eu, H. Kanaya, and K. Yoshitomi, "Circularly polarized one-sided directional slot array antenna for 920MHz application," In: Proceedings of 2015 IEEE 4th Asia-Pacific Conference on Antennas and Propagation (APCAP); Bali, Indonesia. 2015, pp 88–89. https://doi.org/10.1109/APCAP.2015.7374283
crossref
18. A. A. Heidari, M. Heyrani, and M. Nakhkash, "A dual-band circularly polarized stub loaded microstrip patch antenna for GPS applications," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, vol. 92, pp. 195–208, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.2528/PIER09032401
crossref
19. W. T. Hsieh, T. H. Chang, and J. F. Kiang, "Dual-band circularly polarized cavity-backed annular slot antenna for GPS receiver," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 2076–2080, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAP.2012.2186229
crossref

Biography

jees-2026-4-r-372i1.jpg
Dai Duong Nguyen https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0461-319X received the Electrical Engineering degree in 2014 (mention in Industrial Information) from Hanoi University of Science and Technology - Vietnam, M.S. degree in Information, System and Technology from Paris Sud University - France in 2015 and PhD degree in Robotics from Paris Sud University in 2018. Currently, he is lecturer at Department of Automation Engineering (DAE), School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering (SEEE), Hanoi University of Science and Technology (HUST). His research activities are focused on RF devices, visual SLAM and real-time applications on embedded systems.

Biography

jees-2026-4-r-372i2.jpg
Thi Sang Nguyen https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9995-0729 received her Engineer degree (2024) in Electrical Engineering from Hanoi University of Science and Technology (HUST). She is currently an engineer at Dolphin Technology Vietnam Center. Her research interests include antenna, RF circuit and smart sensors.

Biography

jees-2026-4-r-372i3.jpg
Quoc Cuong Nguyen https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5362-2968 received his engineer (1996), M.S. (1998) degrees in Electrical Engineering from Hanoi University of Science and Technology (HUST), Vietnam, and Ph.D. in Signal-Image-Speech-Telecoms from INP Grenoble, France, in 2002. He is the Head of the Sensor Laboratory at the School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering (SEEE), Hanoi University of Science and Technology (HUST). His research interests include signal processing, speech recognition, beamforming, tinymachine learning and smart sensors.

Biography

jees-2026-4-r-372i4.jpg
Minh Thuy Le https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5712-7032 received her Engineer degree (2006) and M.S. degree (2008) in Electrical Engineering from Hanoi University of Science and Technology (HUST), and her Ph.D. degree (2013) in Optics and Radio Frequency from Grenoble Institute of Technology, France. In 2016, she conducted academic research at the mmWave Laboratory at the Nagoya Institute of Technology. From 2022 to 2023, she was a Visiting Professor at the University of Technology Sydney. Since 2013, she has been an Associate Professor and the Radio Frequency Group Leader at the School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, HUST, Vietnam. Her research interests include antennas, indoor localization, energy harvesting, wireless power transfer, and smart sensors.

ABOUT
ARTICLE CATEGORY

Browse all articles >

BROWSE ARTICLES
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Editorial Office
101-1101 Lotte Castle President, 109 Mapo-daero, Mapo-gu, Seoul 04146, Republic of Korea
Tel: +82-2-337-9666    Fax: +82-2-711-7550    E-mail: admin-jees@kiees.or.kr                

Copyright © 2026 by The Korean Institute of Electromagnetic Engineering and Science.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next